• Country/Region
  •   
 

 
Laser Induced Damage Threshold
Scaling Calculator

View All Technical Tools

LIDT(λ1,τ1,∅1)(J/cm2):

Wavelength 1, λ1(nm):

Pulse Duration 1, τ1(ns):

Beam Diameter 1, ∅1(mm):

Wavelength 2, λ2(nm):

Pulse Duration 2, τ2(ns):

Beam Diameter 2, ∅2(mm):

LIDT(λ2,τ2,∅2)(J/cm2): --     

Focal Length Calculator
$$ \text{LIDT} \! \left( \lambda_2, \tau_2, ∅_2 \right) \approx \text{LIDT} \! \left( \lambda_1, \tau_1, ∅_1 \right) \times \left( \frac{\lambda_2}{\lambda_1} \right) \times \sqrt{\frac{\tau_2}{\tau_1}} \times \left( \frac{∅_1}{∅_2} \right)^2  $$
λ1 Wavelength of known LIDT
λ2 Wavelength of new LIDT
τ1 Pulse duration of known LIDT
τ2 Pulse duration of new LIDT
1 Beam diameter of known LIDT
2 Beam diameter of new LIDT

Note: This calculator is valid for wavelengths between 248-1100nm, pulse durations between 1-100ns, and beam diameters between 1-25mm. Since the equation used is only valid for small shifts in use parameters, this calculator is only intended to be used for shifts in use conditions within these limits:

  • ± 5% of input wavelength
  • ± factor of 3 of pulse duration
  • ± factor of 2 of beam diameter

Note: Temporal scaling of pulse duration following (τ21)0.5 is a commonly accepted convention and experimental observations of this relationship range from (τ21)0.3 to (τ21)0.6, depending on what exactly was measured.1

Description

The laser induced damage threshold (LIDT) of an optical component is dependent on wavelength, pulse duration, and beam diameter. If an optic’s specified LIDT is at a different wavelength, pulse duration, or diameter than that of the application, the LIDT must be re-evaluated at the application specifications. For small changes in these specifications, the resulting scaling of LIDT can be approximated. The larger the difference between the test conditions and the use conditions, the less accurate the scaling. This calculator takes a given LIDT value for a pulsed laser at a known wavelength (λ1), pulse duration (τ1), and beam diameter (∅1), and scales it to a new LIDT at a different wavelength (λ2), pulse duration (τ2), and beam diameter (∅2).

Example

Question: What is the approximate LIDT of an optic at a wavelength of 515nm, pulse duration of 30ns, and beam diameter of 2mm if the optic has a specified LIDT of 10 J/cm2 at a wavelength of 532nm, pulse duration of 20ns, and beam diameter of 3mm?

Answer: The approximate LIDT at the new use conditions can be determined by:

\begin{align}
\text{LIDT} \! \left( 515 \text{nm}, 30 \text{ns}, 2 \text{mm} \right) &  \approx 10 \tfrac{\text{J}}{\text{cm}^2} \times \left( \frac{515 \text{nm}}{532 \text{nm}} \right) \times \sqrt{\frac{30 \text{ns}}{20 \text{ns}}} \times \left( \frac{3 \text{mm}}{2 \text{mm}} \right)^2  \\
& = 26.7 \tfrac{\text{J}}{\text{cm}^2} 
\end{align}

The approximate LIDT at the new use conditions will be more than 2X higher than the LIDT at the test conditions.

Related Resources and Products

Laser Line
Mirrors

Laser Beam
Expanders

Laser
Lenses

Laser
Beamsplitters

Laser
Windows

Laser
Polarization

Laser
Prisms

Laser
Filters

References

  1. Niemz, M. H. “Threshold Dependence of Laser‐Induced Optical Breakdown on Pulse Duration.” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 66, no. 10, Dec. 1994, pp. 1181–1183., doi:10.1063/1.113850.
  2. Rainer, F., et al. “Bulk And Surface Damage Thresholds Of Crystals And Glasses At 248 nm.” Optical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, 1983, pp. 431–434., doi:10.1117/12.7973139.
  3. Rastogi, Vinay, et al. “Laser Induced Damage Studies in Borosilicate Glass Using Nanosecond and Sub Nanosecond Pulses.” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 463, 1 Mar. 2017, pp. 138–147., doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.03.006.
  4. Smith, Arlee V., and Binh T. Do. “Bulk and Surface Laser Damage of Silica by Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulses at 1064 Nm.” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 26, 9 Sept. 2008, pp. 4812–4832., doi:10.1364/ao.47.004812.
  5. Stuart, B. C., et al. “Nanosecond-to-Femtosecond Laser-Induced Breakdown in Dielectrics.” Physical Review B, vol. 53, no. 4, 9 Feb. 1996, pp. 1749–1761., doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.1749.
Was this content useful to you?

Need a Quote? Add a stock number to begin our two-step quote process.

Edmund Optics Facebook Edmund Optics Twitter Edmund Optics YouTube Edmund Optics LinkedIn Edmund Optics Instagram

PROUD MEMBERS OF:

ACMAApomaThe Laser InstituteOSASPIE

×